CAPE TOWN – The newly appointed Interim Board wants to restore public confidence in Cricket South Africa following a string of controversies that have engulfed the organisation over the last18 months.
The board met on Monday to address a host of matters, including the appointment of the new board, restructuring of domestic cricket, transformation, revisiting the Nicholson Report and the Fundudzi Forensic Report, which led to the chief executive Thabang Moroe losing his job and and the board tendering their resignations.
“We will do everything possible to ensure that those responsible for misdeeds and bringing the game and the organisation into disrepute, are held to account,” newly appointed CSA Interim Board member Judith February said.
“The new Board also looks forward to working shoulder-to-shoulder with CSA’s dedicated employees who have never lost sight of the organisation’s mandate to develop and uplift cricket.
“Taking immediate action is paramount to the progress of the game as we enter a busy cricketing season.”
The CSA Board discussed the matters below:
Appointment of the Board
The current Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI) would be amended to facilitate the appointment of the Board. This would reflect the agreement reached between the Members’ Council and the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture, Nathi Mthethwa, last week. The Board presides over a transition period to deal with corporate governance failures which had taken place within CSA, and will further manage the nominations process for a new Board to take its place.
The Minister’s referral
It was agreed that transformation, and growing the women’s game, were two specific aspects of the minister’s brief. These were issues for longer-term consideration even as they infuse all current discussions.
Lines of Authority
In terms of the current MOI, CSA Members’ Council is the highest decision-making authority in South African cricket. The Board therefore accounts to the Members’ Council. However, the Board clarified the lines of authority between itself, the Members’ Council, and executive management. The Board is responsible for all operational matters within CSA, with the executive management reporting directly to the Board and not the Members’ Council.
The Nicholson Report
The Board revisited this report and is determined to focus on the restructuring of CSA, specifically the Nicholson recommendations regarding Board composition. On this, the Board discussed two options: one being a 9-member Board as recommended in the Nicholson report, and the second, being a smaller Board. Both options would have a majority of independent members and an independent chair. The Members’ Council has already held consultations regarding both these options. The Members’ Council and the Board will engage on the issue in the next days, with the view to amending the MOI expeditiously and with due care.
Domestic restructuring of cricket
The Board considered Dave Richardson’s recommendations regarding restructuring the men’s domestic game. This discussion will be ongoing between the Board, the Members’ Council, and SACA. The Board mandated Haroon Lorgat, Omphile Ramela and Andre Odendaal to engage with the Members’ Council as well as the Cricket committee on this issue.
A discussion ensued regarding South Africa’s view on the ICC Presidency given that the vote on this is imminent. The two candidates are Greg Barclay of New Zealand and Imran Khwaja of Singapore. In addition to a discussion on the merits of each candidate and the implications for CSA, the Board discussed who the appropriate representative of CSA should be at the ICC. The Chair will discuss this as a matter of urgency with the Acting CSA President, Rihan Richards, this week. The Board is of the view that one of its members ought to represent South Africa at the ICC.
The Board discussed certain aspects of the report and has tasked a small sub-committee comprised of Judge Yacoob, Dawn Mbatha, Judith February and Caroline Mampuru to assess the implications of the report and the action which needs to be taken. The Board resolved to take independent legal advice regarding the process for action which will arise from the report. The sub-committee will also discuss making the report public.
The Board discussed ways in which the damaged reputation of Cricket South Africa could be restored. Regrettably, the relationship between CSA and the media has broken down.
Urgent steps will be taken to restore that relationship and also to provide comfort to the media, the players, employees, and cricket fans, that the focus will be on restarting the season while the Board works to bring governance stability. The Board specifically noted the dissatisfaction expressed by many journalists and cricket fans regarding the four-day matches, which had commenced, but were not being broadcast live.
Judith February will be the Board Member tasked with gaining an understanding of the capacity and competency within CSA to deal with media and its stakeholders. She will make recommendations to the Board with a view to improve communications and repair the reputational damage CSA has suffered.